For manufacturers that have not established a reasonable recall system, the punishment is too low and is most concentrated in consumer feedback. Because manufacturers do not establish a reasonable and complete recall system, the potential harm to consumers is very large, and even to pay for it, manufacturers only need to receive up to 30,000 yuan in punishment. At the time, all people are very eager to know when the fastest time will China's recall system be established. According to industry estimates, it may take a longer period of time. The draft was announced this year and the public was consulted to show that the government has made up its mind to do this thing. However, the specific time for the formal introduction is only “probable next year†but it appears “ "Difficulty" is extremely unlikely. Judging from the overall situation of China's auto industry, at present, China's enterprises generally have a non-standard production and marketing link, manufacturers do not register books with consumers, and most companies themselves lack the strength to make enterprises "recall" difficult to implement. It is still important that the automobile recall system needs to be supported by strict legal provisions. In countries that have implemented the system of car recalls, strict relevant laws and regulations have been established, and special agencies have been set up to accept recalls from automobile manufacturers. The agency responsible for this matter in the United States is the Highway Traffic Authority and Japan is the Ministry of Transport. All countries that implement the recall system stipulate that if the manufacturer does not take the initiative to conduct a recall in accordance with the law, the competent authority will enforce its recall in accordance with the law and impose severe penalties. Therefore, the vacancies of relevant policies and supporting regulations are the biggest “bottleneck†for establishing a recall system in China. Industry sources pointed out that there are many tasks to be carried out at this stage: the overall research on the “recall†of automobiles, the formulation and promulgation of relevant laws and regulations, the promotion and interpretation of relevant laws and regulations, the establishment of relevant systems, the provision of relevant technical inspection methods, and the establishment of relevant certification and supervision institutions. Wait. These tasks cannot be completed overnight. cost Some people pointed out that the current overall situation of China's auto manufacturers is not optimistic. If a company does need to carry out a car recall after the implementation of a car recall, it will not be too costly because it will cause business operations to be difficult or even bankrupt. ? Judging from the costs incurred in cases of recalls that have occurred abroad, the net loss recalled by Mitsubishi Motors Japan is 70 billion yen, but the number of vehicles recalled involves a huge base of 620,000 vehicles and the average cost is approximately 9,000 yuan per vehicle; In China, the cost of Mitsubishi Pajero’s recall will be 10 million U.S. dollars and 72,000 vehicles. The average maintenance cost of each Pajero is less than 140 U.S. dollars, and the total amount is less than 1,200 U.S. dollars, which is only a percentage of the sales price. A very small part. Judging from the official recall of the United States, the cost of most recalls is tens of US dollars per vehicle, and a few hundred dollars higher. In terms of nature, active recalls account for the vast majority of foreign countries, and there are very few cases of forced recalls. The reason for this is first of all, self-discipline, and emphasis on product safety. Second, the cost of active recalls is relatively low. Like the world-famous Volvo Company, it once took the lead in China to recall its mainstream car S80. The result was completely unexpected: sales of its mainstream models in China have not only decreased but have doubled. It can be said that, in the long run, car recalls are also one of the important channels for companies to improve their products and establish their image. Not only can it meet the interests of consumers, but also meet the interests of manufacturers, and it can better meet the interests of the development of the entire Chinese automobile industry. (Shi Tianshu) The factory produces Class A barcodes, serial number barcode printing, QR code label printing stickers customized, upc bracode label variable serial numbers, barcodes, serial numbers. The purchase of this product belongs to commercial trade. Upc Sticker,Upc Barcode Label,Upc Label Printer,Print Upc Labels Jiangmen JiuTai Plastic Product Co.Ltd , https://www.sequoiaent.com
defect
This "Regulation on the Recall of Defective Automobile Products (Draft)", which consists of eight and 47 chapters, covers all aspects of the recall in a comprehensive manner. However, from the perspective of feedback, it is not difficult to find that there are many defects.
It is understood that more than a dozen domestic automobile manufacturers, including Shanghai Volkswagen and SAIC General Motors, have feedback, mainly focusing on the implementation details of the draft. Most manufacturers believe that an independent, authoritative and impartial specialized agency should be established to detect and identify quality defects in automotive products, and to improve automobile product safety standards and automobile identification code standards. Otherwise, product defects will be difficult to distinguish. As to who is the main body of law enforcement, consumers also believe that there should be a special agency to handle this issue because the current testing organizations are mostly affiliated with automobile manufacturers, which can avoid "both athletes and referees."
The other comment is that the definition of “defects†is very important for how to standardize the concept of “recallâ€. The definition in the draft seems to be a cyclic definition, the defect is a defect, and the content of the defect is not clearly identified. Although explained later, does the danger include potential danger? If it is impossible to anticipate whether there is danger now and there is no violation of the regulations, is it included in the list of defects? In addition, if the domestic importer still has the task of modification, and the potential danger lies in the modification, then does the manufacturer bear responsibility? How will the two parties' responsibilities differentiate and what impact will they have on consumers? If the manufacturer is obliged to recall, what other responsible parties are importers of the conversion task?
The product is oil-proof and water-proof, with clear handwriting and barcode printing, good adhesion, long storage time and quality assurance.
After the Regulations on the Administration of Recall of Defective Automobile Products (Draft), which was announced to the public on October 23 and solicited opinions, the community has received enthusiastic responses. If the official "regulation" is likened to a newborn baby, it can now be said that it has entered a period of labor before childbirth.